- Paris Olympics takeaways: What did Team USA’s crunch-time lineup say about NBA’s hierarchy?Posted 4 months ago
- Zach Edey posted an easy double-double in Summer League debut. Here’s why he’ll succeed in NBAPosted 6 months ago
- What will we most remember these champion Boston Celtics for?Posted 6 months ago
- After long, seven-year road filled with excruciating losses, Celtics’ coast to NBA title felt ‘surreal’Posted 6 months ago
- South Florida men’s basketball is on an unbelievable heater– but also still on the bubblePosted 10 months ago
- Kobe Bufkin is balling out for Atlanta Hawks’ G League team. When will he be called up to NBA?Posted 11 months ago
- Former Knicks guards Immanuel Quickley, RJ Barrett may yet prove Raptors won the OG Anunoby tradePosted 12 months ago
- Rebounding savant Oscar Tshiebwe finally gets NBA chance he’s deserved for yearsPosted 1 year ago
- Is Tyrese Maxey vs. Tyrese Haliburton the next great NBA guard rivalry?Posted 1 year ago
- The Detroit Pistons are going to be a problem in a few yearsPosted 1 year ago
New 68-team NCAA Tournament field unfair for first time
- Updated: July 14, 2010
The NCAA has already put a mustache on the Mona Lisa. At least us basketball fans were spared of a fu manchu.
On Monday, the NCAA unveiled its plan for the new 68-team tournament, and it is as awkward and unnecessary as short-shorts on Gheorghe Muresan.
Related: In conference realignment craziness, a plea that UConn won’t join the fray
There will be four play-in games, two of them pitting potential 16 seeds, and the other two matching up the last four teams placed into the bracket.
For example, last year Winthrop would have played Arkansas-Pine Bluff, and Lehigh would have faced Vermont, with the two winners earning number 16 seeds and advancing to play the top two number 1 seeds in the field.
The other two games would have involved a team like UTEP, a number 12 seed, matching up against a team like Virginia Tech, which was one of the last teams left out of last year’s NCAA field.
Was this at all necessary? Of course not.
Will it be good for the tournament? Only if you don’t mind the fact that filling out your bracket will now require a Ph.D.
Now you will have to decide, for example, who the 12-seed in the South is going to be, before you determine if they can make a run to the Sweet 16.
Teams like George Mason, who made a run to the Final Four in 2006 as an 11-seed, will have to play five games instead of four to reach the National Semifinals.
This kind of inequity has never before been part of the tournament. And it could wreak havoc on potential Cinderella stories.
Would the Patriots have had enough gas in the tank to upset Connecticut in the ’06 Elite Eight if they had to play an extra game just to get to that round?
And what about their opponents, the 4 and 5-seeds who will now have less time to prepare for their first-round matchup than other teams in their region?
But perhaps the biggest losers in all of this will be the champions of the small conferences such as the Northeast Conference, and America East.
Instead of taking on the big boys in a once-in-a-lifetime appearance on CBS, half of the 16-seeds will be going home after getting beaten by another small-conference school on Tru TV.
Bracketology just got a little harder. And a little less fun.
Related: UConn recruiting violations continue disturbing trend