- NCAA Tournament Cinderellas Fairleigh Dickinson, St. Peter’s define North Jersey fearlessnessPosted 2 weeks ago
- The rise, fall, and rise again of the Cleveland Cavaliers: How they built a winner in the post-LeBron James eraPosted 2 months ago
- Which teams would earn spots in a permanent Premier League with no relegation?Posted 4 months ago
- He may not be remembered as well as T.J. Sorrentine, but Anthony Lamb is making Vermont Catamount history in NBAPosted 5 months ago
- Danny Ainge is screwing up the Utah Jazz rebuild by being too good at his jobPosted 5 months ago
- Will Bournemouth stay up? Cherries earn another point to stay unbeaten against non-big-six sidesPosted 6 months ago
- After high-scoring performance at EuroBasket, could Sasha Vezenkof be headed to NBA soon?Posted 7 months ago
- Two games, two very different results, and not many conclusions to draw for AFC Bournemouth so far into Premier League seasonPosted 7 months ago
- Premier League Week 2 Takeaways: Forest’s entertaining win, Leicester in trouble and poor BournemouthPosted 8 months ago
- Will any of the players on the Blazers’ Summer League championship roster make an impact in the NBA?Posted 8 months ago
New 68-team NCAA Tournament field unfair for first time
- Updated: July 14, 2010
The NCAA has already put a mustache on the Mona Lisa. At least us basketball fans were spared of a fu manchu.
On Monday, the NCAA unveiled its plan for the new 68-team tournament, and it is as awkward and unnecessary as short-shorts on Gheorghe Muresan.
Related: In conference realignment craziness, a plea that UConn won’t join the fray
There will be four play-in games, two of them pitting potential 16 seeds, and the other two matching up the last four teams placed into the bracket.
For example, last year Winthrop would have played Arkansas-Pine Bluff, and Lehigh would have faced Vermont, with the two winners earning number 16 seeds and advancing to play the top two number 1 seeds in the field.
The other two games would have involved a team like UTEP, a number 12 seed, matching up against a team like Virginia Tech, which was one of the last teams left out of last year’s NCAA field.

The new tournament field is as uncomfortable as Big Gheorghe in short shorts. Photo courtesy: motheringhut.com
Was this at all necessary? Of course not.
Will it be good for the tournament? Only if you don’t mind the fact that filling out your bracket will now require a Ph.D.
Now you will have to decide, for example, who the 12-seed in the South is going to be, before you determine if they can make a run to the Sweet 16.
Teams like George Mason, who made a run to the Final Four in 2006 as an 11-seed, will have to play five games instead of four to reach the National Semifinals.
This kind of inequity has never before been part of the tournament. And it could wreak havoc on potential Cinderella stories.
Would the Patriots have had enough gas in the tank to upset Connecticut in the ’06 Elite Eight if they had to play an extra game just to get to that round?
And what about their opponents, the 4 and 5-seeds who will now have less time to prepare for their first-round matchup than other teams in their region?
But perhaps the biggest losers in all of this will be the champions of the small conferences such as the Northeast Conference, and America East.
Instead of taking on the big boys in a once-in-a-lifetime appearance on CBS, half of the 16-seeds will be going home after getting beaten by another small-conference school on Tru TV.
Bracketology just got a little harder. And a little less fun.
Related: UConn recruiting violations continue disturbing trend